1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2005 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2005 Toyota Aygo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Aygo. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Aygo.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Aygo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2005 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1600 | Aygo |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 53 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 81.5 mm |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 35 L |