1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2006 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 825 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2006 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Bantam |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1297 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 54 L |