1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1600 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 1600 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |
