1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Spark
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Spark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2008 Chevrolet Spark | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1600 | Spark |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 35 L |