1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 706 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Koenigsegg CCX weights approximately 290 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2008 Koenigsegg CCX | |
Make | Abarth | Koenigsegg |
Model | 1600 | CCX |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 806 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |