1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 822 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1600 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 1600 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2986 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 99.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 22.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1712 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
