1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1600 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3010 mm |