1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2010 Porsche Cayenne
To start off, 2010 Porsche Cayenne is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Porsche Cayenne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Porsche Cayenne (405 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Porsche Cayenne should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Porsche Cayenne weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Porsche Cayenne is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Porsche Cayenne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2010 Porsche Cayenne | |
Make | Abarth | Porsche |
Model | 1600 | Cayenne |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 405 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1676 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2855 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 100 L |