1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2012 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2012 Renault Laguna is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Laguna (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2012 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1600 | Laguna |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 218 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |