1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 1949 Allard J2
To start off, 1960 Abarth 2200 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J2 (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J2 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1949 Allard J2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 2200 | 1949 Allard J2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Allard |
| Model | 2200 | J2 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 5416 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 38 L |
