1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 1968 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1968 Mercury Cougar is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Cougar (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 300 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 1968 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Abarth | Mercury |
Model | 2200 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1960 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |