1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 375 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1960 Abarth 2200 has manual transmission. 1960 Abarth 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 1980 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2200 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1960 | 1980 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |