1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 1985 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1985 Caterham 1700 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Caterham 1700 (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 557 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 2200 | 1985 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Abarth | Caterham |
| Model | 2200 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 543 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2240 mm |
