1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 1997 Caterham C21
To start off, 1997 Caterham C21 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1997 Caterham C21. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1997 Caterham C21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1997 Caterham C21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 1997 Caterham C21 | |
Make | Abarth | Caterham |
Model | 2200 | C21 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2260 mm |