1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 795 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 1998 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2200 | Astro |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |