1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 690 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3010 mm |