1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 2200 (133 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Abarth | MCC |
Model | 2200 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 1810 mm |