1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2002 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | 2200 | Colt |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |