1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (120 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 281 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200.
Because 1960 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2005 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Abarth | Daewoo |
Model | 2200 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |