1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2005 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 710 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2005 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 2200 | 2005 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotec |
| Model | 2200 | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1150 mm |
