1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 650 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2200 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 95 L |