1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 460 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Abarth 2200 2008 Cadillac CTS
Make Abarth Cadillac
Model 2200 CTS
Year Released 1960 2008
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2160 cc 2792 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 133 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 1560 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 68 L