1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 946 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 2200 | Compass |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 51 L |