1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1960 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 2200 | 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |