1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2010 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2010 Ford Kuga is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Kuga (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Kuga weights approximately 440 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2010 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Kuga |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 53 L |