1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200.
Because 2011 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2011 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 2200 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 65 L |