1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 2200. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 2200.
Because 1960 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 2200 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Abarth | Audi |
| Model | 2200 | A6 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 75 L |
