1960 Abarth 2200 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 2200 (133 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 351 kg more than 1960 Abarth 2200.
Because 1960 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 2200 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Abarth | Volvo |
Model | 2200 | C30 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |