1960 Abarth 700 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1968 ZAZ 966 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 887 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 700 (63 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 700 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1960 Abarth 700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Abarth 700 (70 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1960 Abarth 700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 700 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Abarth | ZAZ |
Model | 700 | 966 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 696 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2170 mm |