1960 Abarth 700 vs. 1982 Zastava 102

To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 700 (63 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 700 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 102 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1960 Abarth 700.

Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Abarth 700. (70 Nm @ 5800 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Abarth 700.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Abarth 700 1982 Zastava 102
Make Abarth Zastava
Model 700 102
Year Released 1960 1982
Engine Size 696 cc 1299 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 63 HP 49 HP
Engine RPM 7600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 95 Nm
Torque RPM 5800 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 570 kg 770 kg
Vehicle Length 3480 mm 3500 mm
Vehicle Width 1360 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1110 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2160 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]