1960 Abarth 700 vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 Toyota Celica is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 700. (63 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota Celica weights approximately 535 kg more than 1960 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 700 | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 700 | Celica |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 696 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 61 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 59.5 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |