1960 Abarth 700 vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 700. (63 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 810 kg more than 1960 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 1960 Abarth 700 has manual transmission. 1960 Abarth 700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 700 | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Abarth | Lancia |
Model | 700 | Nea |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 696 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2590 mm |