1960 Abarth 750 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1960 Abarth 750 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 750. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1960 Abarth 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 750 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 750 | 60 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3230 mm |
