1960 Abarth 750 vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1962 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 750. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1552 kg more than 1960 Abarth 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 750 | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 750 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1960 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 82 L |