1960 Abarth 750 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 750. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1525 kg more than 1960 Abarth 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 750 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 750 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 95 L |
