1960 Abarth 850 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 850 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 850. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 510 kg more than 1960 Abarth 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 850 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
| Make | Abarth | Buick |
| Model | 850 | Skyhawk |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 850 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
