1960 Abarth 850 vs. 1983 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 850 would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Autobianchi A 112 weights approximately 96 kg more than 1960 Abarth 850.
Because 1960 Abarth 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 850 | 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Abarth | Autobianchi |
Model | 850 | A 112 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 850 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |