1960 Abarth 850 vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 850 would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 850. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda Midge weights approximately 396 kg more than 1960 Abarth 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Abarth 850. (70 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Abarth 850.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 850 | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 850 | Midge |
Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 850 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1400 mm |