1960 Abarth 850 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 850 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 850. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1800 kg more than 1960 Abarth 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Abarth 850. (70 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Abarth 850.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 850 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 850 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 850 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.5 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 2370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |
