1960 Abarth Coupe vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth Coupe would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 2 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1960 Abarth Coupe.
Because 1960 Abarth Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth Coupe | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | Coupe | 2 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 43 L |