1960 AC Aceca vs. 1953 DKW F 89
To start off, 1960 AC Aceca is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1953 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1953 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 DKW F 89 weights approximately 16 kg more than 1960 AC Aceca.
Because 1960 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 1953 DKW F 89 | |
Make | AC | DKW |
Model | Aceca | F 89 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1580 mm |