1960 AC Aceca vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1971 Triumph 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1971 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 351 kg more than 1960 AC Aceca.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph 2000. (136 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1960 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Aceca | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | AC | Triumph |
| Model | Aceca | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
