1960 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 427 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 3493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 550 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2720 mm |