1960 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2001 Ford Mondeo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mondeo (144 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 404 kg more than 1960 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mondeo (190 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 2001 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |