1960 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Holden Jackaroo
To start off, 2002 Holden Jackaroo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Jackaroo (158 HP @ 3900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Jackaroo should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 1151 kg more than 1960 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Jackaroo (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Jackaroo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 2002 Holden Jackaroo | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Aceca | Jackaroo |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 333 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2770 mm |