1960 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 612 kg more than 1960 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Aceca | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Aceca | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 62 L |
