1960 AC Aceca vs. 2009 BMW X5
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (576 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 2009 BMW X5 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | X5 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 576 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |