1960 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca.
Because 1960 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | AC | Saturn |
Model | Aceca | Outlook |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1990 mm |