1960 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Volvo V50

To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Volvo V50. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo V50.

Because 1960 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo V50 (240 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

1960 AC Aceca 2009 Volvo V50
Make AC Volvo
Model Aceca V50
Year Released 1960 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1969 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 123 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 66 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 93.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 18.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 70 L