1960 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Aceca | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | TT |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
